Browse wBW ad-free: bercome a member for just $10/year!

Helmet Inspection Company Creates Damage Scan for Motorcycle Helmets

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

In the world of motorcycle riding today, one of the first things we are taught is never to drop our helmets. It can mean the difference between a safe noggin and a broken watermelon in the event of an incident, yet so much hinges on careful care of the helmet itself.

What happens if a cherished cherub runs off with it and trips if it’s just a little drop if you were given one too many congratulatory bonks on the head after a particularly good run?

How can you be truly sure of the state of your helmet – and your own safety?

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

The Helmet Inspection Company was founded with just such a question in mind – and they’ve created a £39.99 ($54.13 USD) scan that allows you to see if your helmet has been damaged.

“It’s a gut-wrenching feeling,” Aberdeen biker and company owner Martin Slowey tells MCN in an interview, “Having just spent hundreds on a new lid only to have to replace it because it might be damaged.”

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

“We’re all told that once a helmet’s been dropped, no matter from what height, that it should be replaced, but I just couldn’t believe that there wasn’t a way to examine the shell to see if it had suffered any damage. But it was true, and no such service was available, short of cutting the helmet in two.”

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

But technology, Slowey soon found out, could be had by shifting sideways onto another track – in this case, the realm of holography, where aerospace, nautical and military applications use scans to check things like lifeboat hulls and submarine structural integrity.

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

“It involves using a laser to create a 3D holographic image of the helmet from multiple inspection points – this is our baseline,” Martin explains.

“We then systematically move around the helmet, adding a small amount of heat – only a couple of degrees – to the surface. In areas where there’s a defect, the heat will cause the composite to expand and contract at a different rate to the rest of the shell.”

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

“Our instruments – 100,000 times more sensitive than the human eye – detect these movements and feed the info back to the software which displays it as an interference pattern.” 

The big moneymaker, though, is in the ability to list the old helmet on the wall as A-OK for flight.

“We’ve tested customer’s [motorcycle] helmets as old as eight years and passed them as fit to wear because the scan showed no defects to the shell,” says Martin.

“You could think of our service as like an annual MoT for your helmet, just send it to us or take it to one of our drop-off points at a dealership, and if we give it a pass on the inspection certificate, then it remains fit to use at the point we tested it.

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

“Every lid that comes to us gets an NFC sticker applied to it, which is a bit like an ID tag for that helmet, then when we see it again in the future, we just scan the tag to bring up that lid’s previous test data.”

As realistic as the goals of The Helmet Inspection Company are, SHARP – the Government’s independent helmet safety scheme – are more dubious of the helmet tests.

“It’s very difficult to check the condition of the EPS, as not all brands have black-painted EPS coatings on the inside, nor is it possible to see the back side of the EPS closest to the inside of the shell…for this reason, we would not recommend customers rely on a test like this and instead would reiterate that if your helmet has taken any impact, then it’s always best to replace it.”

Interview pictures from MCN's discussion with The Helmet Inspection Company
Credit: MCN

I, for one, would love to see a process like this integrated into a biker’s annual check-up, though it appears there are still some kinks to be worked out for the scans to be integrated into today’s riding standards.

Our best to the lot, and make sure to check out related articles on helmet safety from our archives

  1. Yes, checking the shell. But as far as helmet is ok for use 8 years on in life….. can’t help but think with the way everyone sues over everything that that might be a step too far, as it didn’t sound like there is any check in the EPS, only the shell.
    I was under the impression a small drop for a empty helmet was unlikely to cause issues as the EPS was unlikely to sustained damage as there was nothing to crush it against.

    1. Hi Ralph!

      From what the people at Snell told me just dropping a helmet doesn’t necessarily wreck it.
      If the shell is cracked or get a hole in it that’s cause to replace it, or if something was inside the helmet when it was dropped (like a hammer or sharp object, or something with some weight equal to a head) that might compress or damage the EPS foam inside and make it unwise to use.

      SHARP might have different ideas based on what is written in this piece.

      1. Hi Jim. SNELL and SHARP are organisations focused on destructive testing of new helmet models on a batch basis. This is very helpful for the consumer when buying a new helmet, but none of these organisations have any meaningful data for actual consumer helmets once they’ve gone into service. Their information is only relevant up to the point of purchase. Thereafter, a helmet’s safety credentials become a mystery and assuming a helmet is safe after a visual inspection is, as our data shows, a false sense of security.

        At best, producers and retailers conduct a visual inspection, which, in all but extreme cases, is wholly ineffective.

        I’ve read articles that suggest some producers use x-ray to test helmet integrity. I seriously hope this is just an urban myth, because any damage to composite material will be transparent to x-ray.

        All the best
        Martin

        1. Hi Martin!

          For the most part I think you’re correct, but when I toured the Snell facility in 2019 they told me that they have run some experimentation with used helmets to see what they could learn and that’s what I’m referring to with my last comment.

          One example was when the California Highway Patrol motorcycle officers would retire or transfer out of the motorcycle division and the helmets they’d been using were sent to Snell for analysis. They learned many things about the shape of helmets ranging in age from 1 to 12 years old. Some had been dropped or mistreated and showed signs of distress, but were still testing ok while others that looked fine were failing.

          I would agree getting a helmet scanned in a non destructive manner would be a great idea if a helmet takes any bump or damage as well.

  2. Yes, checking the shell. But as far as helmet is ok for use 8 years on in life….. can’t help but think with the way everyone sues over everything that that might be a step too far, as it didn’t sound like there is any check in the EPS, only the shell.
    I was under the impression a small drop for a empty helmet was unlikely to cause issues as the EPS was unlikely to sustained damage as there was nothing to crush it against.

    1. Hi Ralph!

      From what the people at Snell told me just dropping a helmet doesn’t necessarily wreck it.
      If the shell is cracked or get a hole in it that’s cause to replace it, or if something was inside the helmet when it was dropped (like a hammer or sharp object, or something with some weight equal to a head) that might compress or damage the EPS foam inside and make it unwise to use.

      SHARP might have different ideas based on what is written in this piece.

Comments are closed.